文章摘要
程保平1,赵弘巍2,彭埃天1,陈霞1,宋晓兵1,凌金锋1.以omp基因为靶标的3 种检测方法对 柑橘黄龙病菌检测效果比较[J].广东农业科学,2014,41(5):141-145
查看全文    HTML 以omp基因为靶标的3 种检测方法对 柑橘黄龙病菌检测效果比较
Comparative study on citrus huanglongbing moleculardetection methods with the omp target gene
  
DOI:
中文关键词: 柑橘黄龙病  常规PCR  LAMP  实时荧光定量PCR
英文关键词: citrus huanglongbing  conventional PCR  LAMP  realtime quantitative PCR
基金项目:广东省农业科技推广重大技术研究项目(2012011 27);广东省现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(粤农[2009]380 号); 广东省农业科学院院长基金(201305);广东省科技创新人才出国 培养计划项目(粤农科[2013]74 号)
作者单位
程保平1,赵弘巍2,彭埃天1,陈霞1,宋晓兵1,凌金锋1 1.广东省农科院植物保护研究所/广东省植物保护新技术重点实验室广东广州510640 2.南京农业大学植物保护学院江苏南京210095 
摘要点击次数: 1664
全文下载次数: 588
中文摘要:
      为了比较以omp 基因为靶标的常规PCR、LAMP 检测方法(Loop-mediated isothermal amplification)和实 时荧光定量PCR 方法在实际检测中对柑橘黄龙病的检测效果,比较了3 种检测方法对柑橘黄龙病菌omp 基因检测 的灵敏度,并运用3 种检测方法对采自广东省田间11 个本地柑橘品种上疑似感染黄龙病的多个病样进行实际检 测。结果显示院3 种检测方法的灵敏度有所不同,依次为常规PCR
英文摘要:
      Detection sensitivity and detection rate of conventional PCR, LAMP and real-time quantitative PCR were compared with the omp target gene. The results showed that LAMP had similar detection sensitivity with real -time quantitative PCR. And both of the two detection methods had higher detection sensitivity than that of the conventional PCR. Then total 35 suspected citrus samples from different cultivers with symptom of HLB in orchard of Guangdong were amplified and confirmed by conventional PCR, LAMP and real-time quantitative PCR. The results showed that LAMP had similar detection rate with real-time quantitative PCR. And both of the two detection methods had higher detection rate than that of the conventional PCR. This research indicated that conventional PCR could be used in large scale diagnosis of HLB disease, real-time quantitative PCR had the highest detection sensitivity, and LAMP was simple, fast and didn爷t rely on the expensive equipments, had good application prospect.
  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器

手机扫一扫看