文章摘要
邢 皓,王中元,李 雯.不同包装方式对荷兰豆贮藏品质和采后生理的影响[J].广东农业科学,2015,42(8):22-25
查看全文    HTML 不同包装方式对荷兰豆贮藏品质和采后生理的影响
Effects of different packaging methods on storage qualityand postharvest physiology of sweet broad pe
  
DOI:
中文关键词: 荷兰豆  保鲜  包装  贮藏品质
英文关键词: sweet broad pea  preservation  packaging  storage quality
基金项目:
作者单位
邢 皓,王中元,李 雯 海南大学园艺园林学院/教育部热带生物资源保护与开发利用重点实验室 
摘要点击次数: 1341
全文下载次数: 1224
中文摘要:
      以新鲜采收的荷兰豆(软荚种)为材料,研究保鲜膜(聚乙烯膜)、保鲜膜打孔、保鲜袋(聚乙烯袋)、 保鲜袋打孔、乙烯吸收剂包装等5种包装方法对荷兰豆贮藏品质和采后生理的影响。结果表明不同包装方式对 荷兰豆品质和生理的影响存在差异,乙烯吸收剂包装的保鲜效果最好,能显著抑制荷兰豆色泽变化,延缓叶绿素 含量和Vc 含量的下降,抑制纤维素含量的增加,抑制丙二醛(MDA)的积累,保持较高的好果率及贮藏品质;其 次是保鲜膜和保鲜袋包装处理,保鲜膜打孔包装的保鲜效果最差。
英文摘要:
      The effects of five kinds of packaging methods(polypropylene film,polypropylene film withholes,polypropylene bag,polypropylene bag with holes and ethylene absorbent packaging)on storage quality andpostharvest physiology of fresh harvested sweet broad peas were investigated in this study. The results showed thatthere were evident differences of the effects of different packaging methods on the quality and physiology of peas,thepreservation effect of ethylene absorbent packaging was the best,it could significantly inhibit the color change,delaythe decrease of contents of chlorophyll and Vc,impress the increase of cellulose content,and inhibit the accumulationof malondialdehyde(MDA)content,therefore,it could maintain the high rate of good fruit and storage quality. Theeffects of polypropylene film and polypropylene film bags were better,polypropylene film with holes had the worsteffect on storage quality of peas.
  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器

手机扫一扫看