| 王雅楠,利宏宁,李宇辰,等.农业农村数字化对农户增收的影响机制研究[J].广东农业科学,2024,(4):- |
|
PDF
HTML
农业农村数字化对农户增收的影响机制研究 |
| Study on the influence mechanism of digitalization of agriculture and rural areas on farmers' income increase |
| 投稿时间：2024-03-28 修订日期：2024-04-18 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 农业农村数字化 农户增收 熵权TOPSIS 中介效应 门槛效应 |
| 英文关键词: Digitalization of agriculture and rural areas Increase of household income Entropy-weighted TOPSIS Intermediate effect Threshold effect |
| 基金项目:国家社会科学(编号:20CJY023)、国家级大学生创新创业资助项目(编号:S202310712042) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 16 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 【目的】农业农村数字化是推动乡村振兴、建设农业强国的必由之路，对农户增收具有显著的赋能效应。构建农业农村数字化的综合评价体系，实证探究农业农村数字化的增收效应及作用机制，为缓解“数字鸿沟”难题、保障农业农村数字经济高质量发展提供政策启示。【方法】选取2011—2020年我国31个省份面板数据，运用熵权TOPSIS法对农业农村数字化水平进行测算，然后使用固定效应、中介效应考察数字化对农户增收的影响及作用机制，采用门槛模型探究数字化与农户收入增长之间的门槛效应。【结果】（1）农业农村数字化对农户增收有显著的促进作用，数字化水平每增加1%单位，农户收入平均增长57.4元；正向效应在东部地区较为显著，但在中部地区表现为抑制、西部地区促进效应并不明显，表明存在“数字鸿沟”；（2）农业农村数字化通过农户兼业发展、加速土地流转、提高农户融资概率、促进农产品销售等途径作用于农户收入增长；（3）数字普惠金融在农业农村数字化与农户增收间存在显著的双重门槛效应，第一门槛值为33.401，第二门槛值为148.370。随着阈值区间的提高，农业农村数字化对农户收入增长呈现出先抑制后促进的“正U型”关系。【结论】农业农村数字化能够有效促进农户增收，但“数字鸿沟”困境仍然存在；提出加强数字基础设施建设、提供农业数字化培训和教育、促进农村数字普惠金融发展、制定区域差异化的数字化发展策略等政策启示，以促进农户增收。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| 【Objective】The digitization of agriculture and rural areas is considered a crucial element in promoting rural revitalization and enhancing agricultural capabilities, significantly contributing to the increase of rural household income. This research aims to develop an extensive framework for evaluating the digitization of agriculture and rural areas, empirically investigating its effectiveness in income enhancement and clarifying the operational mechanisms. Additionally, this research provides policy-oriented insights to alleviate the challenges of the "digital divide" and to advance the sophisticated development of the digital economy in agricultural and rural contexts.【Method】Selected panel data from 31 provinces in China from 2011-2020, applied the entropy-weighted TOPSIS method for assessing the level of digitalization in agriculture and rural areas. Utilized fixed and mediation effects to investigate the influence and mechanisms of digitalization on farmers' income enhancement. Employed a threshold model to probe the threshold effects between digitalization and the growth of farmers' income.【Result】(1) Digitalization in agriculture and rural areas significantly enhances farmers' income; a 1% increase in digitalization level corresponds to an average income growth of 57.4 CNY for farmers. The positive effect is more pronounced in the eastern regions, while it appears to be inhibitory in the central regions and less evident in promoting income in the western regions, indicating the presence of a "digital divide". (2) Digitalization in agriculture and rural areas contributes to farmers' income growth through multiple channels: fostering diversification of farmers' occupations, accelerating land circulation, enhancing the likelihood of farmers obtaining financing, and promoting the sale of agricultural products. (3) Digital inclusive finance exhibits significant dual threshold effects between digitalization in agriculture and rural areas and farmers' income growth, with the first threshold value at 33.401 and the second at 148.370. As the threshold interval increases, the impact of digitalization on farmers' income growth demonstrates a "positive U-shaped" relationship, initially inhibitory and subsequently promotive.【Conclusion】Digitalization in agriculture and rural areas effectively facilitates income growth for farmers, yet the challenge of the "digital divide" persists. Consequently, this paper proposes policy implications such as enhancing digital infrastructure, providing training and education in agricultural digitalization, promoting the development of rural digital inclusive finance, and formulating region-specific digital development strategies to further augment farmers' income. |
|
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
|
|
