| 张喜梅，谢世友.两种生态足迹研究方法在重庆市的应用与分析[J].广东农业科学,2013,40(24):148-152 |
|
查看全文
HTML
两种生态足迹研究方法在重庆市的应用与分析 |
| Application of two ecological footprint method in Chongqing city |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 传统生态足迹 能值生态足迹 承载力 重庆市 |
| 英文关键词: traditional ecological footprint energy ecological footprint carrying capacity Chongqing city |
| 基金项目:国家科技支撑计划项目（2011BAC09B01，2006BAC01A16）；重庆市自然科学基金重点项目（CSTC2009BA0002） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1510 |
| 全文下载次数: 653 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 分别运用传统生态足迹和能值生态足迹两种研究方法，对重庆市2011年的生态足迹和生态承载力进行具体的计算和对比分析遥结果表明：能值生态足迹方法和传统生态足迹方法计算的重庆市2011年生态赤字分别为2.07、3.487 hm2/cap，表明该区社会经济发展处于一种不可持续的状态。对两种方法的计算结果进行分析并对重庆市的可持续发展提出相应的对策。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| By using traditional ecological footprint method and energy ecological footprint method, this paper calculated and analyzed the ecological footprint and the bio-capacity of Chongqing city in 2011. The results showed that the ecological deficits of Chongqing city in 2011 calcuted by energy and traditional ecological footprint methods were 2.07 hm2/cap and 3.487 hm2/cap, respectively. The ecological footprint value based on the two methods both exceeded its carrying capacity, which indicated that the social and economic development of the study area was not sustainable. The results of the two methods 憎藻re compared in this paper and some proposals for sustainable development of Chongqing city were offered. |
|
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
