文章摘要
莫泽君 1 ,夏忠文 2,班国军 2,喻奇伟 2,陈 雪 2,赵婷婷 1 ,颜 梁 1 ,吴 浪 1 ,刘仁祥 1.黔西县适宜烤烟品种筛选研究[J].广东农业科学,2018,45(12):13-19
查看全文    HTML 黔西县适宜烤烟品种筛选研究
Selection of suitable flue-cured tobacco varieties for Qianxi county
  
DOI:10.16768/j.issn.1004-874X.2018.12.003
中文关键词: 黔西县  烤烟  品种筛选  灰色关联度
英文关键词: Qianxi County  flue-cured tobacco  variety screening  grey correlation degree
基金项目:毕节市烟草公司科技项目(毕烟201652050024149);贵州省烟草公司项目(黔烟科201611);贵州 省人才团队建设项目(20154011);贵州省高层次创新型人才培养计划一百层次人才项目(20165663)
作者单位
莫泽君 1 ,夏忠文 2,班国军 2,喻奇伟 2,陈 雪 2,赵婷婷 1 ,颜 梁 1 ,吴 浪 1 ,刘仁祥 1 1. 贵州大学烟草学院 / 贵州省烟草品质重点实验室贵州 贵阳 550025 2. 贵州省毕节市烟草公司贵州 毕节 551700 
摘要点击次数: 1893
全文下载次数: 660
中文摘要:
      为筛选适宜在黔西县种植的烤烟品种,促进烟叶产业可持续发展,选用近年育成的贵烟 201 等 10 个品种,测定其植物学、农艺、经济和品质等性状,采用灰色关联度分析法进行综合分析。结 果表明:贵烟 201、贵烟 202、PVH1452、毕纳 1 号的株高、节距、茎围适宜,顶叶开片好;贵烟 201 的经济性状最好,产值达 55 169.34 元 /hm2,其次是贵烟 202、毕纳 1 号和贵烟 4 号,均显著优于对照 品种 K326;金海 1 号、贵烟 202、贵烟 201 的化学成分含量和协调性略优于对照;云烟 110、云烟 87、 金海 1 号的感官质量优于对照品种。灰色关联度分析结果表明:贵烟 201(0.8835)、KRK26(0.8835) 和贵烟 202(0.8524)的综合表现明显优于对照品种 K326(0.7891)和云烟 87(0.7621);贵烟 4 号(0.8068) 和毕纳 1 号(0.8032)的综合表现略优于对照。可见,贵烟 201、KRK26、贵烟 202 适宜在黔西县示范推广, 贵烟 4 号、毕纳 1 号宜进一步进行较大面积的示范验证。
英文摘要:
      Abstract:In order to select the varieties of flue-cured tobacco suitable for planting in Qianxi County, and promote the sustainable development of tobacco production, the botanical, agronomic, economic and qualitative characters of 10 varieties bred in recent years, such as Guiyan 201, were measured and Grey Relational Analysis was carried out for comprehensive analysis. The results showed that the plant height, pitch, stem circumference and apical leaf of Guiyan 201, Guiyan 202, PVH1452, Bina No. 1 were in good condition. The economic characters of Guiyan 201 were the best, reaching the output value of 55 169.34 yuan / hm2, followed by Guiyan 202, Bina No. 1 and Guiyan No. 4, which were significantly superior to the control variety K326. The chemical composition and coordination of Jinhai No.1, Guiyan 202 and Guiyan 201 were slightly better than that of the control; the sensory qualities of Yunyan 110, Yunyan 87 and Jinhai No.1 were superior to that of the control. The comprehensive performance of Guiyan 201 (0.8835), KRK26 (0.8835) and Guiyan 202 (0.8524) was obviously better than that of the control varieties - K326 (0.7891) and Yunyan 87 (0.7621), and the comprehensive performance of Guiyan No. 4 (0.8068) and Bina No. 1 (0.8032) was slightly better than that of the control. It suggested that Guiyan 201, KRK26 and Guiyan 202 were suitable for demonstration and promotion in Qianxi County while Guiyan No. 4 and Bina No. 1 should be further demonstrated and verified on a larger scale.
  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器

手机扫一扫看