| 翟羽佳，何多兴.传统农业村“三变”改革路径及综合效益评价——以重庆市开州区福德村为例[J].广东农业科学,2020,47(3):139-147 |
|
查看全文
HTML
传统农业村“三变”改革路径及综合效益评价——以重庆市开州区福德村为例 |
| “Three Changes”Reform Path and Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation of Traditional Agricultural Villages—A Case Study of Fude Village, Kaizhou District, Chongqing City |
| |
| DOI：10.16768/j.issn.1004-874X.2020.03.019 |
| 中文关键词: 传统农业 “三变”改革 综合效益 熵权 -AHP 模糊评价 |
| 英文关键词: traditional agriculture “Three Changes”reform comprehensive benefits entropy weight AHP fuzzy evaluation |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金（41701611）；重庆市技术预见与制度创新重点项目（cstc2017jsyj-jsyjBX0015） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1635 |
| 全文下载次数: 608 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 解决传统农业村普遍存在资源闲散、经济乏力等相关问题，明晰“三变”改革路径，集聚资源资
金资产要素，引导土地传统经营模式改革，为“三变”改革可持续发展及实现乡村振兴提供参考。以重庆福德
村为例，分析传统农业村“三变”改革发展路径，构建“三变”改革综合效益评价指标体系，采用熵权 -AHP
模糊综合分析法定量评价福德村“三变”改革前后综合效益变化情况。2018 年福德村“三变”改革综合效益指
数为 0.758，处于“良好”，农村经济稳定增长，社会效益、经济效益提升显著；相较 2015 年，其村庄得分提升 0.498，
经济效益得分提升 0.388，生态环境效益得分提升 0.216，综合效益总得分提升 0.395，“三变”改革发展势头明晰。
社会效益“三变”改革解决了传统农业产业零散分化、经营效益低下等问题，提升了乡村综合发展效益，但面
临着农业经营风险把控难度大、景观多样性单一混乱、建设用地股份化推进相对停滞、合作股权不稳定等问题。
在此基础上，为保障“三变”改革可持续发展并完善相关改革路径，提出相关的对策建议。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| To solve the common problems of idle resources and weak economy in traditional agricultural villages, clarify
the reform path of “Three Changes”, gather resources and capital assets, guide the reform of traditional land management
mode, and provide references for the sustainable development of “Three Changes”reform and rural revitalization, this
paper analyzes the “Three Changes”reform and development path of the traditional agricultural village, constructs the
comprehensive benefit evaluation index system of the “Three Changes”reform, and uses the entropy weight AHP fuzzy
comprehensive analysis method to quantitatively evaluate the comprehensive benefit changes of Fude Village of Chongqing
City before and after the “Three Changes”reform. In 2018, the comprehensive benefit index of “Three Changes”reform
in Fude Village was 0.758, which was in a “good”position, with stable growth of rural economy; its social and economic
benefits improved significantly. Compared with 2015, its village score, economic benefit score, ecological and environmental
benefit score and overall benefit score increased by 0.498, 0.388, 0.216 and 0.395, respectively. The “Three Changes”reform
and development momentum is clear. The reform of “Three Changes”in social benefits has solved the problems of scattered differentiation of traditional agricultural industries and low operating benefits, and improved the comprehensive development
benefits of rural areas. However, it is faced with many problems, such as the difficulty of controlling agricultural operation risks, the
single and chaotic landscape diversity, the relative stagnation of construction land shareholding, and the instability of cooperative
equity. On this basis, in order to ensure the sustainable development of the “Three Changes”reform and improve the relevant
reform path, relevant countermeasures and suggestions are proposed. |
|
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
|
|
