文章摘要
陈树鹏,刘昊澄,杨婉媛,余元善,傅曼琴,卜智斌,梁楚璇.干燥方式对九制陈皮挥发性风味物质的影响[J].广东农业科学,2022,49(1):142-150
查看全文    HTML 干燥方式对九制陈皮挥发性风味物质的影响
Effect of Different Drying Methods on the Volatile Flavor of Nine-process Dried Tangerine Peel
  
DOI:10.16768/j.issn.1004-874X.2022.01.017
中文关键词: 九制陈皮  香气化合物  气相离子迁移谱(GC-IMS)  偏最小二乘回归分析(PLSR)  感官分析
英文关键词: Nine-process Dried Tangerine Peel  aroma compound  Gas Chromatography-Ion Mobility Spectroscopy (GC-IMS)  Partial Least-Squares Regression (PLSR) analysis  sensory analysis
基金项目:广东省现代农业产业园建设科技支撑计划项目(JB-CYYCZ-2020071400006);广东省扬帆计划引进创新创业团队项目(2017YT05H045);广东省农业科学院院长基金(202031);潮州市科技计划项目(2019ZX25)
作者单位
陈树鹏,刘昊澄,杨婉媛,余元善,傅曼琴,卜智斌,梁楚璇  
摘要点击次数: 1040
全文下载次数: 557
中文摘要:
      【目的】香气是衡量食品品质的重要评价指标之一。九制陈皮以其独特的香气而闻名,比 较不同干燥方式对九制陈皮香气的影响。【方法】采用气相离子迁移谱(Gas Chromatography- Ion Mobility Spectroscopy,GC-IMS)对烘干与晒干两种干燥方式九制陈皮的挥发性风味化合物进行比较分析,根据其特征 风味指纹图谱、感官分析以及偏最小二乘回归分析(PLSR),探讨了不同工艺产品之间的差异。【结果】两种 样品共鉴定出46种单体及部分物质的二、三聚体挥发性物质,主要包括醛、醇、酯、酮、烯烃、酸以及呋喃7大 类。分析指纹图谱发现,两种样品的挥发性成分存在差异,其中苯乙酸乙酯、乙酸乙酯以及3-甲基丁醛等6种特 征物质为晒干样品的主要特征挥发性风味成分,2-甲基-1-丁醇、(E)-2-己烯-1-醇、(Z)-3-己烯-1-醇、 环己酮、γ-己内酯等13种特征物质为烘干样品的主要特征挥发性风味成分,烘干样品的香气更加丰富。PLSR分 析发现,烘干样品与柑橘香、干草香、果香和甜香香气属性强度具有更高的相关性,优于晒干样品,进一步验 证了九制陈皮GC-IMS分析结果与感官分析结果的准确性。【结论】GC-IMS技术能够快速鉴定、区分不同干燥 方式(烘干和晒干)制备的九制陈皮挥发性风味物质,烘干制备的九制陈皮香气更丰富。
英文摘要:
      【Objective】Aroma is one of the important evaluation indicators to measure the quality of food. Nineprocess Dried Tangerine Peel is famous for its unique aroma. The study was carried out to compare the effects of different drying methods in the aroma of tangerine peel.【Method】Gas chromatography-ion mobility spectroscopy (GC-IMS) was used to compare and analyze the volatile flavor compounds of dried tangerine peel made by two drying methods (baking and sun-drying). According to the characteristics of volatile compounds, flavor fingerprints and sensory analysis and Partial Least-Squares Regression (PLSR) analysis, the differences between different products were explored.【Result】The two samples shared 46 kinds of monomers and dimers and trimers of some substances, mainly including aldehydes, alcohols, esters, ketones, olefins, acids and furans. According to the fingerprints, there are differences in the types and contents of the volatile aroma components contained in the two samples. Among them, six characteristic substances such as ethyl phenylacetate, ethyl acetate and 3-methylbutyraldehyde were the main characteristic volatile flavor components of the sundried samples, while 13 components such as 2-methyl-1-butanol, (E)-2-hexen-1-ol, (Z)-3-hexen-1-ol, cyclohexanone, γ-caprolactone were the main characteristic volatile flavor components of the baked samples, which had a richer aroma. PLSR analysis of baked samples had a higher correlation with the citrus aroma, hay aroma, fruity and sweetness attribute intensity, which were better than those of sun-dried samples, further verifying the accuracy of GC-IMS analysis results and sensory analysis results of Nine-process Dried Tangerine Peel.【Conclusion】GC-IMS can quickly identify and distinguish the volatile flavor compounds of the Nine-process Dried Tangerine Peel prepared by baking and sun-drying, and the NineProcess Dried tangerine peel prepared by baking has a richer aroma.
  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器

手机扫一扫看