文章摘要
“Three Changes”Reform Path and Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation of Traditional Agricultural Villages—A Case Study of Fude Village, Kaizhou District, Chongqing City
  
DOI:10.16768/j.issn.1004-874X.2020.03.019
Author NameAffiliation
翟羽佳,何多兴 西南大学地理科学学院重庆 400715 
Hits: 1633
Download times: 608
Abstract:
      To solve the common problems of idle resources and weak economy in traditional agricultural villages, clarify the reform path of “Three Changes”, gather resources and capital assets, guide the reform of traditional land management mode, and provide references for the sustainable development of “Three Changes”reform and rural revitalization, this paper analyzes the “Three Changes”reform and development path of the traditional agricultural village, constructs the comprehensive benefit evaluation index system of the “Three Changes”reform, and uses the entropy weight AHP fuzzy comprehensive analysis method to quantitatively evaluate the comprehensive benefit changes of Fude Village of Chongqing City before and after the “Three Changes”reform. In 2018, the comprehensive benefit index of “Three Changes”reform in Fude Village was 0.758, which was in a “good”position, with stable growth of rural economy; its social and economic benefits improved significantly. Compared with 2015, its village score, economic benefit score, ecological and environmental benefit score and overall benefit score increased by 0.498, 0.388, 0.216 and 0.395, respectively. The “Three Changes”reform and development momentum is clear. The reform of “Three Changes”in social benefits has solved the problems of scattered differentiation of traditional agricultural industries and low operating benefits, and improved the comprehensive development benefits of rural areas. However, it is faced with many problems, such as the difficulty of controlling agricultural operation risks, the single and chaotic landscape diversity, the relative stagnation of construction land shareholding, and the instability of cooperative equity. On this basis, in order to ensure the sustainable development of the “Three Changes”reform and improve the relevant reform path, relevant countermeasures and suggestions are proposed.
View Full Text   View/Add Comment  Download reader