文章摘要
左金鹰,陆建农,殷学贵,黄冠荣,张柳琴,林海虹,张星语,刘陆洲.蓖麻高产宜机收杂交组合评价[J].广东农业科学,2024,51(1):21-30
查看全文    HTML 蓖麻高产宜机收杂交组合评价
Evaluation on High-yield Cross Combination of Ricinus communis L. Suitable for Mechanical Harvest
  
DOI:10.16768/j.issn.1004-874X.2024.01.003
中文关键词: 蓖麻  灰色关联度分析  主成分分析  聚类分析  高产  机械收获
英文关键词: Ricinus communis L.  grey relational analysis  principal component analysis  cluster analysis  high yield  mechanical harvest
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(31271759)
作者单位
左金鹰,陆建农,殷学贵,黄冠荣,张柳琴,林海虹,张星语,刘陆洲 广东海洋大学滨海农业学院广东 湛江 524088 
摘要点击次数: 395
全文下载次数: 367
中文摘要:
      【目的】对蓖麻杂交组合进行联合评价,为筛选高产、宜机收蓖麻品种提供理论参考。【方法】联用灰色关联度分析、主成分分析和聚类分析对 30 个蓖麻杂交组合的产量性状、宜机收性状和光合性能 3 个方面进行综合评价。【结果】在灰色关联度分析中,根据育种目标构建了理想品种;通过各组合与理想品种之间的加权关联度评选出 N19(0.768)、N7(0.751)、N11(0.727)、N10(0.717)、N6(0.713)和 N13(0.712)6 个组合。其中,前 4 个组合的加权关联度优于淄蓖 5 号(0.714),后 2 个组合的加权关联度与淄蓖 5 号接近;主成分分析结果将10 个性状归纳为株型因子、产量决定因子和光合与分枝夹角因子 3 个主成分,累计贡献率达 67.07%。30 个组合中,21 个组合的综合得分均大于淄蓖 5 号(-0.699),且仅 N18(2.370)、N4(1.848)、N19(1.742)和 N11(1.019)4个组合的得分大于 1,并以 N19 最为突出,其得分远高于其他材料;聚类分析结果显示,在欧氏距离值为 22 处可将30 个组合划分为 4 个类群,第Ⅳ类群成员(包括 N19、N11和 N30)的整体表现与理想品种最为相似,但分枝夹角(59.10°)较大,仍需进一步改良。【结论】综合 3 种评价结果,避免了多余材料入选和优良材料丢失,最终筛选出 N19 和N11 2 个产量高、株型好和光合速率高的蓖麻杂交组合,它们的综合表现均优于淄蓖 5 号,为品种改良方向提供参考。
英文摘要:
      【Objective】A joint evaluation on Ricinus communis cross combinations was conducted to provide a theoretical reference for screening high-yield varieties suitable for mechanical harvest. 【Method】The yield trait, adaptability for mechanical harvest and photosynthetic performance of 30 R. communis cross combinations were jointly evaluated by grey relational analysis, principal component analysis and cluster analysis.【Result】In the grey relational analysis, 6 combinations including N19 (0.768), N7 (0.751), N11 (0.727), N10 (0.717), N6 (0.713) and N13 (0.712) with weighted correlation degree between various combinations and the ideal varieties were screened out. Among which, the former 4 combinaitons had higher weighted correlation degrees than that in Zibi 5 (0.714), and the weighted correlation degrees of the latter 2 were close to that in Zibi 5.Principal analysis results showed that, 10 traits were classified into 3 principal components, namely, plant type factor, yield determining factor and photosynthetic and branching angle factor, with a cumulative contribution rate of 67.07%. Among the 30 combinations, the comprehensive scores of 21 combinations were higher than that of Zibi 5 (-0.699), and only 4 combinations, N18 (2.370), N4 (1.848),N19 (1.742) and N11 (1.019) had comprehensive scores larger than 1, of which N19 was the most prominent with a much higher score than that in other 3 combinations. Cluster analysis revealed that, the 30 combinations could be classified into 4 groups at Euclidean distance value equal to 22. Among them, Group IV members (including N19, N11 and N30) with the best overall performance was most similar to the ideal varieties based on the average performance in each cluster, however, the branching angle (59.10°) was large and still expected to be improved.【Conclusion】Based on the above 3 evaluation results, the comprehensive evaluation avoids the acceptance of redundant germplasm and the loss of elite germplasm. The N19 and N11 with high yield, good plant type and high photosynthetic rate were selected as the optimal Ricinus communis cross combinations, and their comprehensive performances were better than that of Zibi 5, providing a direction for further improvement of varieties.out of varieties.
  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器

手机扫一扫看